Rebate $REBATE

$3.9k

launched

The opening took

31.3%

Let past the tax

25 wallets

Of those, bought

1

They spent

0.018 ETH

The dev took

30.6%

1 bought tax free and took 0.50%. 3 paid the tax and took 0.18%. The creator took 30.6%.

Whose money it was

1 of the 25 were first funded from an exchange or a bridge (0x56c262…e58a8b, an exchange withdrawal wallet, unnamed). That is not a shared purse, so it does not count above.

Paid by one address

1

Share the creator's funder

0

Funded by another of them

0

Largest source0x852724…5c31ca· paid for 1 of them

The wallets

0.7749 ETH

1
0x19A73a…E93833
0.75 ETH
the creator
30.6%
2
0xaf0dd5…4e31e5
0.0182 ETH
let past the tax
0.50%
3
0x57268e…b5d138
0.0025 ETH
paid the tax
funded by 0x8527…31ca
funded by 0x8527…31ca
0.07%
4
0x5373fb…b1287b
0.0021 ETH
paid the tax
funded by 0x56c2…8a8b
funded by 0x56c2…8a8b
0.06%
5
0xe4a727…c61075
0.002 ETH
paid the tax
funded by 0x4a6e…34e2
funded by 0x4a6e…34e2
0.05%

The account it points at

@rebatelaunch30 launches claim it, 10 bundled

Across all 30 launches naming it, not this one.

Launches naming it

30

That opened bundled

33%

Wallets they exempted

230

A link is typed by the creator, not agreed by the account.
Your account? Put this coin’s CA in your X bio.

This ticker elsewhere

5 matching listings elsewhere. Same ticker; no matching X link found.

solanaRebateLiquidity unavailable
solanaRebate LaunchLiquidity unavailable
baseRebateLiquidity unavailable
baseRebate

Who launched it

0x19A73a…E93833<0.0001 ETH in it

Exempt automatically at launch, so counted on its own above.